We accidentally undid bug 4479 when fixing bug 7793, specifically in r37660. When shadowing, the shadower should be considered a lower priority user than the owner of the session. So we should continue respecting the display configuration of the session owner.
Should we prevent this on the server instead of having a client setting? That would be more robust enforcement of this behaviour. It would limit us if we want to make this a user/shadower choice in the future, though.
This has been fixed now. I verified build 3235 on Fedora 38, Windows 11 and macOS 13. > MUST: > > * When a shadower resizes his/her window, the session must not be resized. > > * When a session owner resizes his/her window, the session must be resized. Yep, verified the following scenarios on all 3 native client platforms: ✓ Using native client, session owner resizes his window. The session resizes to follow the window size, making it both larger and smaller. ✓ Using Web Access, session owner resizes his window. The session resizes to follow the window size, making it both larger and smaller. ✓ Shadower connects to session owned by user on native client. He resizes his window, but the session doesn't resize. ✓ Shadower connects to session owned by user on Web Access. He resizes his window, but the session doesn't resize. > COULD: > > * The shadow-resize behavior could be enforced on the server side. Due to time constraints, this was not prioritized. A FIXME was committed in the code.
