Back to bug 8161

Who When What Removed Added
ossman 2023-05-31 12:55:25 CEST See Also https://bugzilla.cendio.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7636, https://bugzilla.cendio.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8159
ossman 2023-05-31 13:40:58 CEST See Also https://bugzilla.cendio.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8162
ossman 2023-06-07 13:08:15 CEST Target Milestone --- MediumPrio
tobfa 2023-08-25 08:59:42 CEST Assignee bugzilla-qa tobfa
CC tobfa
Target Milestone MediumPrio 4.16.0
samuel 2023-08-29 19:35:54 CEST CC samuel
alexander.zeijlon 2023-09-01 12:49:56 CEST CC alexander.zeijlon
alexander.zeijlon 2023-09-04 13:44:59 CEST Acceptance Criteria , it should be made clear that this is not supported (and needs to be implemented).

* The new HTTP-API should be written with extensibility in mind.

EXTRA:
* All features of cgi.py should be supported in our HTTP-API.
Keywords prosaic
Acceptance Criteria MUST:
* There should be no regressions in functionality for POST events done to our tlwebadm and tlwebaccess when replacing cgi.py with a new HTTP-API.

* If the new HTTP-API does not cover a certain type of POST request/event
ossman 2023-09-05 14:09:13 CEST See Also https://bugzilla.cendio.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8222
linma 2023-09-06 08:33:46 CEST CC linma
linma 2023-09-12 17:20:43 CEST Status NEW RESOLVED
Resolution --- FIXED
Acceptance Criteria MUST:
* There should be no regressions in functionality for POST events done to our tlwebadm and tlwebaccess when replacing cgi.py with a new HTTP-API.

* If the new HTTP-API does not cover a certain type of POST request/event, it should be made clear that this is not supported (and needs to be implemented).

* The new HTTP-API should be written with extensibility in mind.

EXTRA:
* All features of cgi.py should be supported in our HTTP-API.
MUST:
* There should be no regressions in functionality for POST events done to our tlwebadm and tlwebaccess when replacing cgi.py with a new HTTP-API.

* If the new HTTP-API does not cover a certain type of POST request/event, it should be made clear that this is not supported (and needs to be implemented).

* The new HTTP-API should be written with extensibility in mind.

* tlclient.cgi should not depend on any modules provided by ThinLinc.
samuel 2023-09-14 13:28:05 CEST Keywords samuel_tester
samuel 2023-09-15 16:04:35 CEST See Also https://bugzilla.cendio.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6082
samuel 2023-09-15 16:29:43 CEST Status RESOLVED CLOSED
samuel 2023-12-13 14:56:13 CET Keywords prosaic relnotes

Back to bug 8161